Institutionalizing performance management in Asia: Looking East or West?

    • 3 Citations

    Abstract

    Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the features and impact of performance management reforms implemented in the bureaucracies of several Asian states. Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on government reports, reports of international bodies, and the data produced for various governance indicators, as well as scholarly analysis of performance management and new public management. Findings: After the 1997 Asian financial crisis, many Asian countries, including developed and developing, have introduced a variety of performance management systems into their bureaucracies. This has been encouraged by international agencies as part of their "good governance" agendas. Despite this, the goal of achieving efficient and workable public administration has still not been realized in many cases. Anti-corruption measures are not effective, and efficiency and service delivery in public organization has not significantly improved. However, political leaders must recognize that the building of rational legal bureaucracy in which patronage influence is reduced, creating networked governance, allowing engagement with civil society, and fostering high employee motivation, are the other prerequisites for achieving efficient and accountable government. Only then will performance management contribute to this aim. Originality/value: The value of this paper is to show that within the context of Asian bureaucracies, performance management is not a panacea to guarantee improvements in public administration. Other requirements are necessary, as indicated above, especially the creation of rational legal bureaucracy. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)347-360
    Number of pages14
    JournalInternational Journal of Public Sector Management
    Volume26
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2013 Jul 1

    Fingerprint

    bureaucracy
    public administration
    financial crisis
    corruption
    civil society
    methodology

    Keywords

    • Administrative reform
    • Asia
    • Corporate governance
    • Corruption
    • Good governance
    • Institutionalization
    • New public management
    • Performance (public administration)
    • Performance management
    • Public administration

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • Political Science and International Relations
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
    • Public Administration

    Cite this

    Institutionalizing performance management in Asia : Looking East or West? / Koike, Osamu.

    In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.07.2013, p. 347-360.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Koike, Osamu / Institutionalizing performance management in Asia : Looking East or West?

    In: International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.07.2013, p. 347-360.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{944e548740224c1dba351296a0ef66f6,
    title = "Institutionalizing performance management in Asia: Looking East or West?",
    keywords = "Administrative reform, Asia, Corporate governance, Corruption, Good governance, Institutionalization, New public management, Performance (public administration), Performance management, Public administration",
    author = "Osamu Koike",
    year = "2013",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1108/IJPSM-05-2013-0066",
    volume = "26",
    pages = "347--360",
    journal = "International Journal of Public Sector Management",
    issn = "0951-3558",
    publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
    number = "5",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Institutionalizing performance management in Asia

    T2 - International Journal of Public Sector Management

    AU - Koike,Osamu

    PY - 2013/7/1

    Y1 - 2013/7/1

    N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the features and impact of performance management reforms implemented in the bureaucracies of several Asian states. Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on government reports, reports of international bodies, and the data produced for various governance indicators, as well as scholarly analysis of performance management and new public management. Findings: After the 1997 Asian financial crisis, many Asian countries, including developed and developing, have introduced a variety of performance management systems into their bureaucracies. This has been encouraged by international agencies as part of their "good governance" agendas. Despite this, the goal of achieving efficient and workable public administration has still not been realized in many cases. Anti-corruption measures are not effective, and efficiency and service delivery in public organization has not significantly improved. However, political leaders must recognize that the building of rational legal bureaucracy in which patronage influence is reduced, creating networked governance, allowing engagement with civil society, and fostering high employee motivation, are the other prerequisites for achieving efficient and accountable government. Only then will performance management contribute to this aim. Originality/value: The value of this paper is to show that within the context of Asian bureaucracies, performance management is not a panacea to guarantee improvements in public administration. Other requirements are necessary, as indicated above, especially the creation of rational legal bureaucracy. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the features and impact of performance management reforms implemented in the bureaucracies of several Asian states. Design/methodology/approach: The paper draws on government reports, reports of international bodies, and the data produced for various governance indicators, as well as scholarly analysis of performance management and new public management. Findings: After the 1997 Asian financial crisis, many Asian countries, including developed and developing, have introduced a variety of performance management systems into their bureaucracies. This has been encouraged by international agencies as part of their "good governance" agendas. Despite this, the goal of achieving efficient and workable public administration has still not been realized in many cases. Anti-corruption measures are not effective, and efficiency and service delivery in public organization has not significantly improved. However, political leaders must recognize that the building of rational legal bureaucracy in which patronage influence is reduced, creating networked governance, allowing engagement with civil society, and fostering high employee motivation, are the other prerequisites for achieving efficient and accountable government. Only then will performance management contribute to this aim. Originality/value: The value of this paper is to show that within the context of Asian bureaucracies, performance management is not a panacea to guarantee improvements in public administration. Other requirements are necessary, as indicated above, especially the creation of rational legal bureaucracy. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    KW - Administrative reform

    KW - Asia

    KW - Corporate governance

    KW - Corruption

    KW - Good governance

    KW - Institutionalization

    KW - New public management

    KW - Performance (public administration)

    KW - Performance management

    KW - Public administration

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879699199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879699199&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/IJPSM-05-2013-0066

    DO - 10.1108/IJPSM-05-2013-0066

    M3 - Article

    VL - 26

    SP - 347

    EP - 360

    JO - International Journal of Public Sector Management

    JF - International Journal of Public Sector Management

    SN - 0951-3558

    IS - 5

    ER -